Children of Men — nowhere to stand still
A worn-out man, a pregnancy in an infertile world, and some remarkable long takes. The direction makes the danger feel immediate.
A worn-out man, a pregnancy in an infertile world, and some remarkable long takes. The direction makes the danger feel immediate.

Spoiler-free review.
The world of Children of Men looks exhausted. No babies have been born for eighteen years, and the loss of a future is visible in the way people move through the present. The film gives you that feeling through streets, broadcasts, and background detail rather than a long explanation.
Clive Owen plays Theo well — a man who seems worn out before the story even starts. Protecting a pregnant woman gives him a purpose, but he doesn’t suddenly turn into a smooth action hero. His hesitation and awkwardness help keep the danger real.
The long takes are the standout. Alfonso Cuarón lets movement and action build within a shot, so you have time to register the surroundings and then realise how exposed everyone is. They look astonishing, but their strongest effect is making it feel as though there is no convenient break from what is happening.
I didn’t connect with some of the supporting characters as much. The film’s energy is so strong that a few relationships feel rushed, and the symbolism can feel a bit heavy-handed. I liked the filmmaking more than I engaged with the full story.
7/10. Worth seeing for the atmosphere, Owen’s worn-out performance, and those amazing long takes that feel like they’re unfolding in real time.
Directed by Alfonso Cuarón · 2006 · English. Film details · Poster source. Artwork © its respective rights holders.
A worn-out man, a pregnancy in an infertile world, and some remarkable long takes. The direction makes the danger feel immediate.
— Desly